Position of the Providence Church Elders:
Calvinism
The study of salvation in theology is properly called Soteriology.
Assigned to John Calvin, Calvinism is the name of the system of
theology that most accurately distils biblical thought on this great
doctrine. This can be confusing at times, leading people to assume
those who hold this position follow a man or cling to his writings as
the source of salvation. To help alleviate this confusion we will
refer to this system of thought by the title the Doctrines of Grace.
Preface
Man's chief end is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever. To that end,
He has condescended to impart spiritual life to people who were dead in
trespasses and sins. Those He made alive are now debtors to His Grace
and we love Him and flee to Him for all their satisfaction.
Now that we know Him, we desire to know Him more. Because He first
loved us, we love Him all the more. That love drives us to an even
deeper search of the Scripture to uncover His will for our lives and
understand what He wrought in so great a salvation. It is in response
to His love and after diligent searches of Scripture the elders of
Providence Church are firmly convinced of the doctrine of salvation
that is presented in the paper.
We are firm believers in the sovereignty of God in all areas of our
lives. Therefore, we do not condemn others who do not see salvation as
revealed in Scripture this way. If anyone holds to the historic
essentials of the faith, summarized in our statement of faith, we
consider him a brother in Christ. God gives grace to the hearers, and
we are content in that.
The Historical Introduction section is taken from Bethlehem Baptist
Church's position paper of the same name. A complete explanation of
this great doctrine can be found at the Desiring God Ministries website
(www.desiringGOD.org).
Historical Introduction
John Calvin, the famous theologian and pastor of Geneva, died in 1564.
Along with Martin Luther in Germany, he was the most influential force
of the Protestant Reformation. His Commentaries and Institutes of the
Christian Religion are still exerting tremendous influence on the
Christian church worldwide.
The churches which have inherited the teachings of Calvin are usually
called Reformed as opposed to the Lutheran or Episcopalian branches of
the Reformation. While not all Baptist churches hold to a reformed
theology, there is a significant Baptist tradition which grew out of
and still cherishes the central doctrines inherited from the Reformed
branch of the Reformation.
The controversy between Arminianism and Calvinism arose in Holland in
the early 1600's. The founder of the Arminian party was Jacob Arminius
(1560-1609). He studied under the strict Calvinist Theodore Beza at
Geneva and became a professor of theology at the University of Leyden
in 1603.
Gradually Arminius came to reject certain Calvinist teachings. The
controversy spread all over Holland, where the Reformed Church was the
overwhelming majority. The Arminians drew up their creed in Five
Articles (written by Uytenbogaert), and laid them before the state
authorities of Holland in 1610 under the name Remonstrance, signed by
forty-six ministers. (These Five Articles can be read in Philip Schaff,
Creeds of Christendom, vol. 3, pp. 545-547.)
The Calvinists responded with a Counter-Remonstrance. But the official
Calvinistic response came from the Synod of Dort which was held to
consider the Five Articles from November 13, 1618 to May 9, 1619. There
were eighty-four members and eighteen secular commissioners. The Synod
wrote what has come to be known as the Canons of Dort. These are still
part of the church confession of the Reformed Church in America and the
Christian Reformed Church. They state the Five Points of Calvinism in
response to the Five Articles of the Arminian Remonstrants. (See
Schaff, vol. 3, pp. 581-596).
So the so-called Five Points were not chosen by the Calvinists as a
summary of their teach-ing. They emerged as a response to the Arminians
who chose these five points to oppose.
It is more important to give a positive biblical position on the five
points than to know the exact form of the original controversy. These
five points are still at the heart of biblical theology. They are not
unimportant. Where we stand on these things deeply affects our view of
God, man, salvation, the atonement, regeneration, assurance, worship,
and missions.
Somewhere along the way the five points came to be summarized under the acronym TULIP.
T-Total depravity.
U-Unconditional election
L-Limited atonement
I-Irresistible grace
P-Perseverance of the saints
NOTE: We are not going to follow this order in our presentation. There
is a good rationale for this traditional order: it starts with man in
need of salvation and then gives, in the order of their occurrence, the
steps God takes to save his people. He elects, then he sends Christ to
atone for the sins of the elect, then he irresistibly draws his people
to faith, and finally works to cause them to persevere to the end.
We have found, however, that people grasp these points more easily if
we follow a presentation based on the order in which we experience them.
- We experience first our depravity and need of salvation.
- Then we experience the irresistible grace of God leading us toward faith.
- Then we trust the sufficiency of the atoning death of Christ for our sins.
- Then we discover that behind the work of God to atone for our
sins and bring us to faith was the unconditional election of God.
- And finally we rest in his electing grace to give us the strength and will to persevere to the end in faith.
This is the order we will follow in our presentation.
We would like to spell out what we believe the Scripture teaches on
these five points. Our great desire is to honor God by understanding
and believing his truth revealed in Scripture. We are open to changing
any of our ideas which can be shown to contradict the truth of
Scripture. We do not have any vested interest in John Calvin himself,
and we find some of what he taught to be wrong. But in general we are
willing to let ourselves be called Calvinists on the five points,
because we find the Calvinist position to be biblical.
We share the sentiments of Jonathan Edwards who wrote in the Preface to
his great book on The Freedom of the Will, "I should not take it at all
amiss, to be called a Calvinist, for distinction's sake: though I
utterly disclaim a dependence on Calvin, or believing the doctrines
which I hold, because he believed and taught them; and cannot justly be
charged with believing in every thing just as he taught."
Total Depravity
When we speak of humans as "totally depraved," they are making
a qualitative, rather than a quantitative statement. The effect of the
fall upon man is that sin pervades every part of his personality -- his
thinking, his emotions, and his will. Man is not as sinful as he can be
at all times (quantitative) rather, every aspect of his life is tainted
by sin.
The unregenerate (unsaved) man is dead in his sins (Romans 5:12).
Without regeneration man is incapable of responding to the Gospel call
(John 8:47). This is why Total Depravity has also been called "Total
Inability." The man without saving knowledge of God will never come to
this knowledge without God's first making him alive through Christ
(Ephesians 2:1-5).
Irresistible Grace
The doctrine of Irresistible Grace means that the elect of God will
respond to the outward call of God when the Holy Spirit calls them
inwardly. We do not teach that sinful men cannot resist the Holy
Spirit (Isaiah 43:24; Ephesians 4:30) in his flesh. But a man who is
dead in his sins (Ephesians 2:1-5) must be drawn by the Holy Spirit
continually and effectually if he is to be saved, for he has no desire
(being dead) to come on his own. Much like Lazarus in John chapter 11,
when Jesus calls a sinner to life he does not have the option of
remaining dead. The sinner comes forth as Lazarus did.
Limited Atonement
We will use Wayne Grudem's definition for atonement: "The atonement is
the work Christ did in his life and death to earn our salvation." The
idea of a "limited" atonement may prejudice the reader into thinking
Calvinists hold there was something deficient in the atonement that
makes it insufficient. We might better use the word particular
atonement since that describes the position more clearly.
We affirm that Christ died for the sin of the world (John 1:29) but
only satisfied the wrath of God for the people God the Father had
promised to the Son. John 17:9 says, "I pray for them. I do not pray
for the world but for those whom You have given Me, for they are
Yours." And in verse 19 of that same chapter Jesus prays again, "And
for their sakes I sanctify Myself, that they also may be sanctified by
the truth." This sanctification is the setting apart unto salvation.
It is for the sake of those whom the Father has given Jesus that He
sanctifies Himself.
So in what sense did Christ die for the "sin of the world" as recorded
in John 1:29? Every good gift of God is a benefit of the work of
Christ. The rain falls on the just and the unjust, the gospel's
general call goes out, "God is the savior of all men especially those
who believe" (1 Timothy 4:10), all because of Christ. Praise God, for
his mercies are fresh every morning.
God's mercy might extend to all men temporarily, but Jesus laid down
his life for His sheep in a very particular way. John chapter 10 tells
us that Jesus has sheep (v. 14) and that He lays down His life for
those sheep (vv. 15, 16). He also states that there are those who are
not His sheep and the reason they do not believe He is the Good
Shepherd is because they are not of His flock (vv. 25-27)
There are many passages of Scripture that indicate that Christ gave
Himself up for a definite group of people. In Acts 20:28 God is said
to have obtained the church “with the blood of His own Son.” In John
6:37-39 Jesus relates that the Father gives a people to the Son and the
Son loses none of them. If God gave the Son for the whole world
(general atonement), then the Son would lose none of them and all would
be in heaven.
Unconditional Election
How did God determine for whom Christ would die? The Bible calls the
people who shall believe the elect of God (Mark 13:27; Romans 8:33;
Titus 1:1). Unconditional Election is the doctrine that states that
God chose those whom He was pleased to bring to knowledge of himself,
not based upon any merit shown by the object of his grace and not based
upon his looking forward to discover who would "accept" the offer of
the gospel. God has elected, based solely upon the counsel of his own
will (Romans 9:15, 21). Election occurred before the foundation of the
world (Ephesians 1:4-8) and in many respects wonderful mystery shrouds
this Scripture requires that we believe the Gospel (John 3:16-18) and
consistently presents the doctrine of man's responsibility. It calls
us to "come" (Matthew 11:28; Revelation 22:17), "serve" (Josh 24:15),
"confess" and "believe" (Rom 8:9,10). The doctrine of God's
sovereignty in salvation and man's responsibility are both present in
Scripture and all believers should hold to them.
Perseverance of the Saints
Perseverance of the Saints is a doctrine that states that the saints
(those whom God has saved) will remain in God's hand until they are
glorified and brought to abide with him in heaven. Romans 8:28-39 makes
it clear that when God truly has regenerated a person, he will remain
in God's care. The work of sanctification, which God has brought about
in his elect, will continue until it reaches its fulfillment in eternal
life (Philippians 1:6). Christ assures the elect that He will not lose
them and that they will be glorified at the "last day" (John 6:39). The
Calvinist stands upon the Word of God and trusts in Christ's promise
that He will perfectly fulfill the will of the Father in saving all the
elect.